The $25,000 Polaroid Print

Movie Legend Dennis Hopper, As Captured On 8x10 Polaroid By Actor Jason Lee

Movie Legend Dennis Hopper, As Captured On 8x10 Polaroid By Actor Jason Lee

Hollywood produces some strange “huh?” moments. One of them has recently surfaced. This beautiful 8×10 Polaroid of movie legend Dennis Hopper, who passed away recently, was taken by movie and television actor Jason Lee. Lee is a Polaroid and photography enthusiast, and has worked with one of the legendary 20 x 24 Polaroid cameras. Not only is this guy an enthusiast, but one heck of a great photographer as well. On Friday, Feburary 4th, 2011, this one of a kind Polaroid image was stolen from an L.A. gallery, where Lee simply wanted the image to be seen by others. Who wouldn’t be proud? It is a beautiful portrait. Hopper was also an enthusiastic photographer, and studied under the brilliant William Claxton, celebrated jazz and fashion photographer. Who can forget Hopper as the crazed photojournalist in Apocalypse Now, with a collection of Nikon F’s slung over his shoulders and neck? Why he didn’t shoot Polaroid in that film, one will never know. How did his character get film developed on Col. Kurtz’s remote island? The horror….

I don’t know much about 8×10 Polaroid photography, but am guessing that maybe some kind of negative image was yielded. If so, and Lee saved it, some kind of image reclamation could prehaps take place. Certainly, there is also the sentimental value here, a major factor. As Polaroid photographers know, when you have that print, it is one of a kind, the only one in the world. The actor and the gallery are offering a $25,000 reward for the culprit to return it, anonymously, with no questions asked. It can even be mailed back to the gallery. Just give it back! The heartbreak that Mr. Lee must be experiencing right now can only be imagined.


4 thoughts on “The $25,000 Polaroid Print

  1. Polaroid Type 55 4×5 film yielded a positive and negative, if you treated the “trash” part of the pack in sodium sulfite (I believe). It was made to do this. I have two 8×10 prints made by a friend who worked heavily with that stuff. I don’t know of any 8×10 Polaroid film that had that characteristic. I would guess it was a 4×5 negative enlarged to an 8×10 print.
    A young photographer has found that the Fujifilm ISO100 films can be treated in bleach to yield a negative from, again, the pulled-off side. This is with the 4×5 film and he says it does not work with the 3000 speed film. I can’t wait to try this!

  2. Thank you once again. So many little mini projects and experimental techniques in the Polaroid world. My head could literally explode learning about all of them! This bleach technique looks incredible. I know that many scan the 3000 negatives, and then reverse them in PS, making for a lower contrast, grainer virtual positive.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s